Welcome back. In the last lesson, you learned to find a sentence’s spine: a clear main idea, an identifiable subject, and a specific verb. That work makes today’s revision much easier. Once a sentence has a strong core, you can see which surrounding words genuinely develop the idea and which merely delay it.
This lesson focuses on conciseness without loss. You will learn to remove redundant words and filler phrases while protecting the sentence’s exact meaning, tone, degree of certainty, and emphasis. Concise writing is not bare writing. An elaborate essay needs thoughtful evidence and developed explanation; it does not need verbal padding.
Concise means purposeful, not short
A sentence is wordy when it makes the reader process language that adds no useful information. Concision is the practice of making each word earn its place.
Compare these versions:
Wordy: Due to the fact that the policy was introduced in order to improve student attendance, it was basically successful.
Concise: Because the policy aimed to improve student attendance, it succeeded.
The second sentence says nearly the same thing more directly. It removes phrases that repeat ideas already contained in other words:
- due to the fact that becomes because
- in order to becomes to
- basically is removed because it does not tell us how successful the policy was
But notice an important issue: basically successful may have meant “partly successful” rather than simply “successful.” If the writer intends that limited meaning, a better revision would be:
Because the policy aimed to improve student attendance, it was partly successful.
The goal is not to delete words automatically. The goal is to preserve the intended claim with the fewest words that communicate it accurately.
A useful principle is:
Delete words that repeat, soften, explain, or decorate an idea without changing what the reader understands. Keep words that add a real distinction.
The Purdue OWL guide below introduces the main kinds of removable language: obvious explanation, filler modifiers, repeated wording, redundant pairs, and redundant categories.
Eliminating Words - Purdue OWL
Read “Eliminating Words” from the Purdue Online Writing Lab. It provides a practical catalog of common redundancies, but its larger lesson is to revise for a reader who can infer what does not need to be stated.
Read Sections 1 and 2, “Eliminate words that explain the obvious or provide excessive detail” and “Eliminate unnecessary determiners and modifiers.” Begin at the opening advice, then study the examples of filler words such as “really,” “basically,” and “particular.” Focus on why each cut does not remove necessary information. Then continue through Sections 3–5, “Omit repetitive wording,” “Omit redundant pairs,” and “Omit redundant categories.” Read the discussion of repetition through the end of the page. Pay particular attention to the difference between a specific word, such as “pink,” and an unnecessary general category, such as “in color.”
Three kinds of unnecessary language
Most sentence-level wordiness falls into three categories. Seeing the category helps you choose the right revision.
1. Redundant pairs: two expressions doing one job
A redundant pair contains two words that communicate the same basic idea. Choose the stronger or more suitable one.
| Redundant wording | Concise revision | Why |
|---|---|---|
| each and every student | each student | Both words mean all members of a group. |
| full and complete report | complete report | A complete report is already full. |
| future plans | plans | Plans concern the future by definition. |
| end result | result | A result is an outcome. |
| true facts | facts | Facts are true by definition. |
| completely finish | finish | To finish is to complete. |
Redundancy can hide inside seemingly formal phrases:
Wordy: The committee reached a final conclusion after discussing the various differences between the two proposals.
Concise: The committee reached a conclusion after discussing the differences between the two proposals.
Here, final adds nothing to conclusion, and various repeats the idea already carried by the plural noun differences.
However, do not treat all paired words as errors. Writers sometimes repeat an idea deliberately for rhythm or emphasis:
The storm destroyed homes, hopes, and routines.
Those nouns are not duplicates; each names a different loss. In a literary or persuasive passage, repetition can also heighten urgency:
We need not excuses, not delays, not another empty promise.
The test is simple: does the second word add a distinct idea, a purposeful rhythm, or needed emphasis? If not, cut it.
2. Filler qualifiers: words that sound emphatic but say little
Early drafts often include conversational intensifiers and hedges:
- really
- very
- basically
- actually
- definitely
- kind of
- sort of
- in my opinion
- I think
- it is important to note that
These phrases are not forbidden. Their value depends on their function in the sentence.
Filler: The setting is very important because it really shows that the character is lonely.
Revision: The isolated setting emphasizes the character’s loneliness.
The revision does more than remove very and really. It chooses a more exact relationship: the setting emphasizes loneliness.
Yet qualifiers sometimes preserve an important degree of certainty:
The survey probably underestimates how many students work after school.
Deleting probably would make the statement more confident than the evidence permits. Keep it if uncertainty is part of the meaning.
Similarly, actually can be useful when it corrects an expectation:
Although the scene appears comic, it actually reveals the narrator’s insecurity.
Here, actually marks a contrast between appearance and interpretation. It is not empty.
Use this distinction:
| If the word does this… | Then… |
|---|---|
| Adds no measurable degree or specific qualification | Delete it. |
| States uncertainty, approximation, contrast, or limitation | Keep it, or replace it with a more exact word. |
| Attempts to create emphasis alone | Consider using a stronger noun or verb instead. |
For example, instead of writing very angry, choose furious only if you truly mean intense anger. Precise vocabulary should not exaggerate a claim merely to make it sound more sophisticated.
3. Wordy phrases: several words where one will do
Some phrases become habitual because they sound formal. In academic writing, though, formality should come from precise thinking, not inflated phrasing.
| Wordy phrase | Usually replace with |
|---|---|
| due to the fact that | because |
| in light of the fact that | because |
| the reason for | because, why, or a direct verb |
| in the event that | if |
| for the purpose of | to |
| at this point in time | now |
| has the ability to | can |
| is able to | can |
| made a decision | decided |
| came to the conclusion | concluded |
| is in agreement | agrees |
Consider an analytical sentence:
Wordy: In the event that readers fail to notice the repeated images of darkness, they may not fully understand the reason for the narrator’s fear.
Concise: If readers miss the repeated images of darkness, they may not fully understand why the narrator is afraid.
The revision removes formal-sounding padding but retains the conditional relationship: readers may not understand the fear if they miss the imagery.
A wordy phrase can often conceal the exact verb your sentence needs. In the previous lesson, you practiced bringing hidden actions to the surface. That same skill supports concision:
Wordy: The school board made the decision to implement a later start time.
Concise: The school board decided to implement a later start time.
The revision is shorter because decided carries the action that made the decision spreads across four words.
The meaning-preservation test
Before you delete a phrase, conduct a quick meaning-preservation test. Read the original and revised versions side by side. Then check five things.
- Facts: Did you remove a detail the reader needs to know?
- Degree: Did very, partly, mostly, or completely express a level that matters?
- Certainty: Did you accidentally turn may into will, or remove a useful word such as probably?
- Relationship: Did the sentence still show cause, contrast, condition, or time correctly?
- Emphasis: Was repetition serving a deliberate rhetorical purpose?
Take this sentence:
Original: At this point in time, the scientist is completely certain that the results are accurate.
A quick deletion gives:
Revision: The scientist is certain that the results are accurate.
This may be a good revision. At this point in time is usually just now, and completely may not add a meaningful degree because certain already conveys confidence.
But imagine the sentence appears in a report tracking the scientist’s changing views. Time now matters:
Better revision: The scientist is now certain that the results are accurate.
The word now preserves the contrast with an earlier stage of uncertainty. It earns its place.
This is why a fixed “banned words” list is less useful than careful reading. Specific, individual, and currently, for example, can be filler, but they can also make a necessary distinction:
Filler: The author provides a specific example of prejudice.
Meaningful: The author provides a specific example of prejudice: the principal denies Maya access to the honors program.
In the first sentence, specific tells the reader little. In the second, the concrete example fulfills the promise.
A reliable revision pass
When you revise an essay, do not try to improve every problem at once. Make one short pass devoted only to unnecessary language. This helps you preserve drafting flow: you can draft freely first, then tighten deliberately.
First, mark likely trouble spots
Scan for these signals:
- doubled words: each and every, full and complete
- absolute terms with extra modifiers: completely finished, very unique
- fillers: really, basically, definitely, kind of
- long phrases beginning with due to, in order to, in the event that, or the reason for
- obvious categories: blue in color, round in shape
- introductory announcements: It is important to note that, Needless to say, It should be mentioned that
Marking a phrase does not mean it must go. It simply means you will test it.
Next, cut or compress one unit at a time
Avoid deleting several phrases in a long sentence all at once. Make one change, then reread.
Draft: Due to the fact that the town experienced a sudden crisis, the mayor made the decision to immediately begin the evacuation process.
Step 1: Because the town experienced a sudden crisis, the mayor made the decision to immediately begin the evacuation process.
Step 2: Because the town experienced a crisis, the mayor made the decision to immediately begin the evacuation process.
Step 3: Because the town experienced a crisis, the mayor decided to begin the evacuation.
The final version is clear and concise. Sudden crisis is usually redundant because a crisis is already urgent and disruptive. Made the decision becomes decided. Immediately may also be unnecessary because an evacuation in response to a crisis implies urgency—unless timing is the point of the sentence.
Finally, read for rhythm and tone
A concise sentence should still sound natural. If you cut too aggressively, the result can become abrupt or vague.
Over-cut: The mayor evacuated.
Balanced: Because the town faced a crisis, the mayor ordered an evacuation.
The balanced sentence contains a clear cause, a visible actor, a precise verb, and the necessary object of the action.
The UNC Writing Center’s short video models this approach: notice how it distinguishes removable fillers from useful signposts and stresses that revision should preserve the intended message.
Writing Concisely - UNC Writing Center
Watch “Writing Concisely” from the UNC Writing Center. It gives a brief, practical checklist for noticing wordiness in a draft without treating every repeated or transitional word as a mistake.
Watch the opening examples to see why early drafts often contain excess phrasing and how a phrase such as “due to the fact that” can be compressed. Then watch filler and audience. Focus on the distinction between useful signposts and excess signposts, and on why phrases such as “I think” often weaken an academic claim. Finish with redundant pairs, which explains why one accurate word is usually stronger than two overlapping ones.
Concision in analytical essays
Because you want to write more elaborate essays, it is worth separating development from wordiness.
Development gives the reader evidence and reasoning:
The repeated image of the locked gate suggests that Maya’s obstacle is social rather than physical. Although she can see the school beyond it, the principal’s refusal prevents her from entering the honors program.
Wordiness delays the same point without developing it:
It is important to note that the repeated image of the locked gate is basically a symbol that seems to show the reader that Maya is facing an obstacle that is not only physical in nature but also social in nature.
The longer version has no more analysis. It has fewer precise claims.
A concise analytical revision might be:
The repeated locked gate symbolizes Maya’s social exclusion: she can see the honors program but cannot enter it.
This sentence is not “simple” in a weak sense. It is compressed because its words carry clear intellectual work:
- repeated locked gate identifies the textual detail
- symbolizes states the interpretive relationship
- social exclusion names the idea
- the colon introduces a concise explanation of how the detail supports that interpretation
As your essays become longer, concision will create room for what readers actually need: evidence, commentary, logical transitions, and a developed line of reasoning.
A compact editing checklist
During a concision pass, ask:
- Does this pair of words express one idea twice?
- Does this modifier add a real degree, limit, or contrast?
- Can a long phrase become one precise word?
- Does a general category repeat what a specific word already tells us?
- Does an introductory phrase merely announce my point instead of making it?
- After revision, have I preserved the sentence’s facts, certainty, relationships, and intended emphasis?
If the answer to the last question is no, restore or replace the missing meaning. Concision is not a competition to reach the smallest word count. It is disciplined control over what the reader must notice.
You now have a method for trimming sentences without thinning their ideas: identify redundancy or filler, revise one unit at a time, and test whether the exact meaning survives. Strong writing can be detailed, nuanced, and elaborate while remaining free of empty language.
Next, you will work on another source of sentence-level confusion: unclear pronoun references and misplaced modifiers.
Can't find a good explanation? Sign up and we'll make it for you
Sign up