Hello again. Last lesson focused on explain answers: linking a cause or feature to a scientific mechanism and then to an effect. A compare question has a different job. You are not mainly explaining why something happens; you are placing two things side by side and making clear, matched statements about them.
In this command-word module, you are building a set of answer structures you can use in any Biology, Chemistry, or Physics topic. Today’s aim is to answer compare questions with paired similarities and differences about the same feature, rather than writing two disconnected lists.
What “compare” asks you to do
Pearson’s science command-word guide defines “compare and contrast” as giving similarities and differences, rather than writing only about one item.
[PDF] GCSE (9-1) Sciences - command words (A4) - Pearson qualifications
Read Pearson’s short command-word guide to fix the core meaning of compare in your memory before learning the exam structure.
On the one-page command-word list, find the “Compare and contrast” entry. It appears after “Comment on” and before “Predict.” Read the Compare and contrast entry, then briefly look at the nearby definitions for “Describe” and “Explain” to keep the three command words distinct.
A reliable working definition is:
Compare = state a similarity and/or difference between two things, using the same feature for both.
The wording of the question matters:
| Question wording | What you must include |
|---|---|
| “State one difference between…” | One clear difference only |
| “State one similarity between…” | One clear similarity only |
| “Compare X and Y” | Similarities and differences, unless the question gives a more specific instruction |
| “Compare the ways…” | Compare the stated process or feature, not unrelated facts |
| “Compare and explain…” | Make comparisons and give reasons for them |
For example, if a question says:
State one difference between salmon and human red blood cells.
then one precise comparison is enough:
Salmon red blood cells contain a nucleus, whereas human red blood cells do not.
Do not add shape if the question says “other than shape.” Examiners often include this phrase specifically because an obvious difference has already been ruled out.
Pearson’s examiner report for an International GCSE Biology paper uses exactly this red-blood-cell example.
[PDF] International GCSE Biology Science Double Award 4SD0 1BR
This official Pearson examiner report shows how a one-mark comparison question is interpreted in a real International GCSE paper.
Go to page 105, Question 10(a)(i). Read the Question 10 discussion. Notice two examiner lessons: name a specific feature, and obey any restriction in the question.
The paired-feature rule
The most important comparison habit is this:
Choose one feature, then say what applies to both items for that same feature.
Think of every sentence as having three parts:
| Part | Example |
|---|---|
| Feature being compared | Presence of a nucleus |
| First item | Salmon red blood cells contain a nucleus |
| Second item | Human red blood cells do not contain a nucleus |
A useful sentence frame is:
[Thing A] has / does / is …, whereas [Thing B] has / does / is …
For similarities, use:
Both [Thing A] and [Thing B] …
Strong paired comparisons
| Feature | Strong comparison |
|---|---|
| Nucleus in red blood cells | Salmon red blood cells contain a nucleus, whereas human red blood cells lack a nucleus. |
| Energy transfer | Photosynthesis transfers light energy into a chemical energy store, whereas respiration transfers energy from glucose. |
| State at room temperature | Bromine is a liquid at room temperature, whereas chlorine is a gas. |
| Circuit arrangement | In a series circuit, components are arranged in one loop, whereas in a parallel circuit they are placed on separate branches. |
| Wave type | Both sound and light transfer energy, but sound is longitudinal whereas light is transverse. |
Each statement compares one clear feature. This allows an examiner to spot the mark point quickly.
Weak, unpaired writing
Photosynthesis uses carbon dioxide. Respiration releases energy. Chlorophyll is needed for photosynthesis. Respiration happens in cells.
There may be correct science here, but it is not clearly structured as a comparison. The statements jump between different features and do not directly tell the examiner how the processes are alike or different.
Repair it by pairing:
Photosynthesis uses carbon dioxide, whereas aerobic respiration produces carbon dioxide.
Photosynthesis requires light energy, whereas aerobic respiration releases energy from glucose.
Both are chemical reactions that occur in living cells.
Now every point is a comparison.
Do not write two separate lists
A common answer format is:
Plant cells: cell wall, chloroplasts, vacuole.
Animal cells: no cell wall, no chloroplasts, small vacuole.
This may contain useful knowledge, but it makes comparison harder to see. It also makes it easy to forget similarities.
Instead, organise the answer by feature, not by organism:
| Feature | Plant cell | Animal cell |
|---|---|---|
| Cell membrane | Present | Present |
| Nucleus | Present | Present |
| Cell wall | Present | Absent |
| Chloroplasts | May be present in photosynthesising cells | Absent |
You do not need to draw a table in the exam unless it is useful. Convert the table into concise paired sentences:
Both plant and animal cells have a cell membrane and a nucleus. However, plant cells have a cellulose cell wall and may contain chloroplasts, whereas animal cells do not.
This is efficient because it includes a similarity and two differences without repeating whole sentences.
Choosing comparison points that can earn marks
Before answering, identify the comparison category in the question. The category tells you what is relevant.
| If the question asks you to compare… | Useful features might include… |
|---|---|
| Two cells or organisms | Structures, functions, size, shape, adaptations |
| Two processes | Reactants, products, energy change, location, conditions |
| Two materials | Bonding or structure, melting point, conductivity, flexibility |
| Two circuits | Arrangement, current, potential difference, effect of a component failing |
| Two energy resources | Renewability, reliability, carbon dioxide emissions, cost |
| Alpha, beta, and gamma | Nature, charge, penetration, ionisation, behaviour in fields |
Suppose the question is:
Compare ionic and covalent substances.
A poor plan would be to write everything remembered about ions and molecules. A better plan is to choose four matched categories:
- What particles or bonds are present
- Structure
- Melting or boiling point
- Electrical conductivity
An answer might be:
Ionic substances contain oppositely charged ions, whereas covalent substances contain atoms joined by shared electrons. Ionic compounds usually have giant ionic lattices, whereas many covalent substances consist of simple molecules. Ionic compounds generally have high melting points, while simple molecular substances have low melting points. Ionic compounds conduct electricity when molten or dissolved because their ions can move, whereas simple covalent substances usually do not conduct.
For a four-mark question, four distinct comparisons are a sensible target. You do not need exactly one sentence per mark, but each extra comparison must add a new feature.
Similarities count too
Students often treat “compare” as meaning “give differences.” Differences are important, but a full compare question can credit similarities as well. Look actively for them.
For example:
Compare diffusion and osmosis.
A well-balanced response could be:
Both diffusion and osmosis involve the net movement of particles from a region of higher concentration to a region of lower concentration. Diffusion can involve many types of particle, whereas osmosis involves water molecules only. Osmosis requires a partially permeable membrane, whereas diffusion does not necessarily require one.
Notice that the similarity is still precise. Avoid vague statements such as:
Both are important.
Both happen in cells.
Both move things around.
These may be true in some contexts, but they are too broad to show secure scientific understanding.
A short visual planning method can help you separate shared features from differences before you write. The example in this video uses non-science examples, but the planning principle transfers directly to science questions.
How to answer 6 mark questions in GCSE Science
Watch the short comparison section from “How to answer 6 mark questions in GCSE Science” by Science Revision Channel. It introduces a simple way to separate similarities from differences before turning them into exam sentences.
Watch the compare framework for the definition and the three-part planning layout. Then watch the worked example. Use the diagram only for planning; in a science answer, write precise paired statements about scientific features.
For revision notes, a simple three-column organiser is useful:
| Only A | Both | Only B |
|---|---|---|
| Features unique to the first item | Genuine shared features | Features unique to the second item |
But in the exam, turn your notes into full comparative sentences. Do not simply write isolated words in three columns unless the question provides a table.
Comparison language that makes marks visible
Use comparison words deliberately. They make your meaning unambiguous.
For differences
- whereas
- while
- unlike
- in contrast
- however
- more or less than
- higher or lower than
Examples:
Magnesium is more reactive than copper.
In a parallel circuit, current has more than one path, whereas in a series circuit there is only one path.
Unlike a metal, a simple molecular substance does not usually conduct electricity.
For similarities
- both
- similarly
- each
- in both cases
Examples:
Both acids and alkalis can conduct electricity when dissolved in water because they contain mobile ions.
Both transverse and longitudinal waves transfer energy without transferring matter overall.
Be careful: words such as more, faster, larger, and higher need a reference point.
Weak:
The wire has more resistance.
Better:
The longer wire has greater resistance than the shorter wire.
Best, if the question asks for explanation too:
The longer wire has greater resistance than the shorter wire because charge carriers collide with ions more often along the longer length.
The first two are comparisons. The final sentence adds an explanation, which should only be included when it is asked for or clearly useful for the marks.
Compare is not explain
This is an especially important distinction after the previous lesson.
| Command word | Main task | Example prompt |
|---|---|---|
| Describe | Report features or a pattern | Describe the graph. |
| Explain | Give why or how, using linked science | Explain why the rate increases. |
| Compare | Give matched similarities and differences | Compare the two cells. |
Consider:
Compare conduction and convection.
A direct comparison answer is:
Conduction transfers thermal energy through collisions between particles, whereas convection transfers thermal energy by the bulk movement of a fluid. Both transfer thermal energy from hotter regions to cooler regions.
If the question instead says:
Explain why convection currents form in a liquid,
you need causal links:
Liquid at the bottom is heated, so its particles move further apart and the liquid becomes less dense. It rises while cooler, denser liquid sinks to replace it.
The difference is not length. It is the job of the answer.
A fast method for any compare question
Use this routine in past-paper practice.
1. Underline the two things being compared
For example: a series circuit and a parallel circuit.
If three things are named, make sure your statements cover the relevant pairings. Do not accidentally compare only the first two.
2. Circle the comparison focus
If the question says “Compare their electrical conductivity,” do not write about melting point or appearance. The focus controls what counts as relevant.
3. Count the marks
For a one-mark “state one difference” question, write one complete paired difference.
For a three- or four-mark comparison, aim for several distinct features. Brief planning prevents repeating the same idea in different words.
4. Write paired sentences
Use “both” for similarities and “whereas” or “while” for differences.
5. Check each point with this question
Have I said something about both items for the same feature?
If not, rewrite the statement.
Common comparison errors
| Error | Why it is risky | Repair |
|---|---|---|
| Writing only about one item | It is description, not comparison | Add the corresponding feature of the other item |
| Giving two facts on unrelated features | The comparison is unclear | Match the feature first: structure with structure, product with product |
| Repeating one idea | It may earn only one mark | Choose a new category, such as structure, function, or condition |
| Ignoring similarities | It misses part of “compare” | Include at least one accurate shared feature when the wording is broad |
| Giving an explanation when only comparison is needed | It wastes time and can introduce errors | State the matched difference first; explain only if asked |
| Ignoring a restriction | The obvious answer may be excluded | Read phrases such as “other than,” “using the data,” or “in terms of…” carefully |
| Vague vocabulary | “Better,” “stronger,” or “different” do not identify a feature | Name the measurable or scientific feature precisely |
The red-blood-cell examiner report gives a real example of the restriction problem: candidates lost credit when they used shape after being told to give a difference other than shape.
Build compare into your flashcards and error log
Add this command-word flashcard:
| Flashcard front | Flashcard back |
|---|---|
| How do I answer “compare”? | Choose the same feature for both items. Use “both” for a similarity and “whereas” or “unlike” for a difference. Give enough distinct features for the marks and follow any stated focus or restriction. |
When you mark topic questions, use short error codes:
- CP1 — wrote about only one item
- CP2 — features were not paired
- CP3 — missed an obvious similarity
- CP4 — repeated the same comparison
- CP5 — ignored the focus or restriction
- CP6 — used vague scientific vocabulary
For each comparison mistake, make a correction in this format:
Feature: …
A: …
B: …
Then cover it and write one paired exam sentence from memory. This turns a past-paper error into a reusable comparison pattern rather than a one-off correction.
Key takeaways
- A compare answer places two or more things side by side using the same feature.
- Use both to show a similarity and whereas, while, or unlike to show a difference.
- A clear comparison is usually better than two separate lists of facts.
- Follow the question’s exact scope: it may ask for one difference, one similarity, or a broader comparison.
- Match your number of distinct comparison points to the mark allocation.
- Do not turn a compare answer into an explanation unless the question asks for reasons as well.
Next, you will practise the command words used in quantitative questions: calculate, determine, estimate, and show that.
Can't find a good explanation? Sign up and we'll make it for you
Sign up