Welcome back. Last lesson focused on turning raw quantitative data into a grouped frequency distribution: equal-width classes, frequencies, and a total that matches the number of observations.
Now we make that table more useful. A count such as “7 scores were between 60 and 69” is helpful, but we often need to know its share of the whole dataset: “about 29%.” We also often need to know how many observations have accumulated up to a point: “13 scores were 69 or below.”
By the end of this lesson, you will be able to calculate and interpret:
- relative frequency: the proportion or percentage in one class;
- cumulative frequency: the running total of counts;
- cumulative relative frequency: the running proportion or percentage.
These are common test-table columns, so the goal is to make the calculation routine rather than something to memorize nervously.
Three columns, three different questions
Start with an ordinary frequency distribution. Let mean the frequency in row , and let mean the total number of observations.
Relative frequency: “What share is in this one class?”
The relative frequency of a class is its frequency divided by the total:
It can be written as:
- a fraction, such as ;
- a decimal, such as ;
- a percentage, such as .
The meaning stays the same. A relative frequency of , for example, means that one quarter of the observations are in that class.
Cumulative frequency: “How many have accumulated up to here?”
A cumulative frequency is a running total. Begin with the first frequency; then keep adding the next row's frequency as you move down the table.
For a score class of 60-69, the cumulative frequency means the number of scores at or below 69. It does not mean the number of scores in the 60-69 class alone.
Cumulative relative frequency: “What percentage has accumulated up to here?”
A cumulative relative frequency is the cumulative frequency divided by the total:
Equivalently, it is the running total of the relative-frequency column:
This is particularly useful for questions asking for the percentage below a cutoff.
For a concise demonstration of the calculations, watch this short segment.
Find the Relative Frequency Cumulative Frequency and Midpoint
“Find the Relative Frequency, Cumulative Frequency and Midpoint” by Daytona State College - Instructional Resources demonstrates the two calculations from the same frequency table. Watch it to see the running-total structure clearly.
Watch relative frequency to see why every class frequency is divided by the same overall total. Then watch cumulative frequency, focusing on how each new entry adds the current class frequency to the preceding running total.
A complete worked example
Use the score distribution from the previous lesson. There were test scores total.
| Test-score class | Frequency |
|---|---|
| 40-49 | 2 |
| 50-59 | 4 |
| 60-69 | 7 |
| 70-79 | 6 |
| 80-89 | 5 |
| Total | 24 |
Step 1: Calculate relative frequencies
Every row uses the same denominator, .
For the class 60-69:
As a percentage:
So about of the scores are from 60 to 69.
Do this for every class. Here, percentages have been rounded to one decimal place.
| Test-score class | Frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|
| 40-49 | 2 | |
| 50-59 | 4 | |
| 60-69 | 7 | |
| 70-79 | 6 | |
| 80-89 | 5 | |
| Total | 24 |
Relative frequency lets you compare groups even when the datasets have different sizes. “7 scores” has a different weight in a class of 24 than in a class of 240; “29.2%” communicates the share immediately.
Step 2: Calculate cumulative frequencies
Now keep a running count.
- First row:
- Second row:
- Third row:
- Fourth row:
- Final row:
| Test-score class | Frequency | Cumulative frequency |
|---|---|---|
| 40-49 | 2 | 2 |
| 50-59 | 4 | 6 |
| 60-69 | 7 | 13 |
| 70-79 | 6 | 19 |
| 80-89 | 5 | 24 |
Interpret the row for 60-69 carefully:
- The ordinary frequency is 7: seven scores lie from 60 through 69.
- The cumulative frequency is 13: thirteen scores are 69 or lower.
Cumulative frequency only makes sense when the rows have a meaningful order. Numerical values and ordered class intervals have one. Categories such as favorite colour do not have a natural order, so a cumulative total for them is usually not meaningful.
Add cumulative relative frequency
You can calculate cumulative relative frequency in either of two valid ways:
- Add the relative frequencies as you move down.
- Divide each cumulative frequency by .
The second method is often safer when rounding is involved.
For the 60-69 row:
So approximately of scores are 69 or below.
| Test-score class | Frequency | Relative frequency | Cumulative frequency | Cumulative relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40-49 | 2 | 8.3% | 2 | 8.3% |
| 50-59 | 4 | 16.7% | 6 | 25.0% |
| 60-69 | 7 | 29.2% | 13 | 54.2% |
| 70-79 | 6 | 25.0% | 19 | 79.2% |
| 80-89 | 5 | 20.8% | 24 | 100.0% |
Notice the different interpretations in the same row:
| Column | Value for 60-69 | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency | 7 | Seven scores are from 60 through 69. |
| Relative frequency | 29.2% | About 29.2% of scores are from 60 through 69. |
| Cumulative frequency | 13 | Thirteen scores are 69 or below. |
| Cumulative relative frequency | 54.2% | About 54.2% of scores are 69 or below. |
The word cumulative always means “include this row and everything before it.”
Reading grouped tables and cutoff language
The wording of a question tells you which column is useful.
“In this class” language
For questions like “What percentage of scores are from 70 to 79?”, use the relative frequency for that single class.
From the table:
“At or below” language
For questions like “How many scores are 69 or below?”, use the cumulative frequency in the 60-69 row.
For “What percentage of scores are 69 or below?”, use the cumulative relative frequency.
“Above” language
For “What percentage of scores are 69 or above?”, it is usually easiest to use the complement of the percentage below 70.
The cumulative relative frequency through 60-69 is , so:
Thus, about of the scores are 70 or higher.
Be precise about endpoints. For whole-number classes, the row 60-69 includes values from 60 through 69. For measured data written as “65.95 to less than 67.95,” the cumulative total through that row represents measurements less than 67.95.
This OpenStax reading shows the same ideas first with individual values and then with grouped height intervals.
1.3 Frequency, Frequency Tables, and Levels of Measurement
Read the relevant part of “1.3 Frequency, Frequency Tables, and Levels of Measurement” from OpenStax. It gives a clear table-based explanation of relative frequency, cumulative relative frequency, and their interpretation for grouped data.
In the “Frequency” section, read the frequency discussion. Focus on the fixed denominator: every frequency is divided by the same total. Then, in the grouped-height example in Table 1.13, read the grouped-height interpretation and Example 1.14 immediately after it. Notice why the cumulative relative frequency in a row answers a “less than the upper endpoint” question.
Visualizing the difference
A relative-frequency graph has a separate bar for each category or class. A cumulative-relative-frequency graph rises because it keeps all earlier observations.

In the chart:
- Grade 1 has a relative frequency of roughly .
- Grade 2 alone has a relative frequency of roughly .
- Through Grade 2, the cumulative relative frequency is roughly .
That last statement combines the first two grades. It does not say that Grade 2 alone contains of students.
A cumulative relative-frequency line has three predictable features when categories are correctly ordered:
- It never goes down.
- It starts at the first class's relative frequency.
- It ends at , or , apart from minor rounding.
Fast checks before you submit a table
Use this short audit.
| Check | What should happen? |
|---|---|
| Total frequency | Adds to the sample size . |
| Relative-frequency total | Adds to or , allowing for small rounding differences. |
| Final cumulative frequency | Equals . |
| Final cumulative relative frequency | Equals or , allowing for rounding. |
| Cumulative columns | Stay the same or increase; they can never decrease. |
| Denominator | Every relative frequency uses the same total . |
A very common error is dividing a class frequency by the previous cumulative frequency. Do not do that. For relative frequency, the denominator is always the total number of observations.
Another common error is to add rounded percentages and worry if the answer is or . That is usually just rounding. If exactness matters, calculate the cumulative relative frequency from the cumulative count divided by , then round only the final displayed result.
Key takeaways
A frequency distribution can show both counts and proportions:
Relative frequency answers “what share is in this class?” Cumulative frequency and cumulative relative frequency answer “how many, or what percentage, are at or below this point?”
In the next lesson, you will use grouped frequency distributions to interpret histograms: shape, skewness, gaps, possible outliers, and whether a distribution looks approximately normal.
Can't find a good explanation? Sign up and we'll make it for you
Sign up